This blog is not about programming languages as much as it’s about products and what makes good products (or more specifically, why good products sometimes don’t get used). I won’t talk about the advantages or disadvantages about the syntax or how they work as programming languages, but I will talk about the product side. We can all have an opinion on that, right?
Real people use Dart. Really.
Just missed the bull’s eye
This is why, perhaps, they struggle to see any kind of adoption over the long term. Google Trends can be a great proxy for market size and adoption, and as you can see “compile-to” languages just don’t seem to be able to hold ground over a long period of time
Going all out
In fact, all the ‘compile to’ tools, languages and libraries have a glass ceiling that becomes pretty visible from their Google trends. Compared this to a Google language that IS its own product, Google Go, we can see stark differences
Google Go is a language that offers an alternative to Python (and more, it’s a fully featured programming language), but it’s not even close to being Python. It can be used independently of Python – could you imagine if Google Go said, “We have this great product, but you can only use it in environments that already use Python. In fact, it compiles to Python. Yay.”. This could work initially, but it would stink for the long-term viability of Go as a product that’s able to grow organically and create its own ecosystem of tools, dedicated users, and carve out its own niche and area in which it thrives. Being decoupled from another product allows it to grow.
A summary of sorts
I beg to differ. Have you used Typescript using a popular IDE like VSCode? It is slow hair tearing build especially with reload server memory hogging in the background. In the real world most of us dont have fast machines, laptops being the norm.
Like GO, dart is well thought out and compiles a lot faster with good essential tools. The Flutter API is brilliant. It is just a matter of time.