(For more resources related to this topic, see here.)
Discipline 1 – finance (financial derivatives)
In general, a financial derivative is a contract between two parties who agree to exchange one or more cash flows in the future. The value of these cash flows depends on some future event, for example, that the value of some stock index or interest rate being above or below some predefined level. The activation or triggering of this future event thus depends on the behavior of a variable quantity known as the underlying. Financial derivatives receive their name because they derive their value from the behavior of another financial instrument.
As such, financial derivatives do not have an intrinsic value in themselves (in contrast to bonds or stocks); their price depends entirely on the underlying.
A critical feature of derivative contracts is thus that their future cash flows are probabilistic and not deterministic. The future cash flows in a derivative contract are contingent on some future event. That is why derivatives are also known as contingent claims. This feature makes these types of contracts difficult to price.
The following are the most common types of financial derivatives:
Futures and forwards are financial contracts between two parties. One party agrees to buy the underlying from the other party at some predetermined date (the maturity date) for some predetermined price (the delivery price). An example could be a one-month forward contract on one ounce of silver. The underlying is the price of one ounce of silver. No exchange of cash flows occur at inception (today, t=0), but it occurs only at maturity (t=T). Here t represents the variable time. Forwards are contracts negotiated privately between two parties (in other words, Over The Counter (OTC)), while futures are negotiated at an exchange.
Options are financial contracts between two parties. One party (called the holder of the option) pays a premium to the other party (called the writer of the option) in order to have the right, but not the obligation, to buy some particular asset (the underlying) for some particular price (the strike price) at some particular date in the future (the maturity date). This type of contract is called a European Call contract.
Consider a one-month call contract on the S&P 500 index. The underlying in this case will be the value of the S&P 500 index. There are cash flows both at inception (today, t=0) and at maturity (t=T). At inception, (t=0) the premium is paid, while at maturity (t=T), the holder of the option will choose between the following two possible scenarios, depending on the value of the underlying at maturity S(T):
Scenario A: To exercise his/her right and buy the underlying asset for K
Scenario B: To do nothing if the value of the underlying at maturity is below the value of the strike, that is, S(T)<K
The option holder will choose Scenario A if the value of the underlying at maturity is above the value of the strike, that is, S(T)>K. This will guarantee him/her a profit of S(T)-K. The option holder will choose Scenario B if the value of the underlying at maturity is below the value of the strike, that is, S(T)<K. This will guarantee him/her to limit his/her losses to zero.
An Interest Rate Swap (IRS) is a financial contract between two parties A and B who agree to exchange cash flows at regular intervals during a given period of time (the life of a contract). Typically, the cash flows from A to B are indexed to a fixed rate of interest, while the cash flows from B to A are indexed to a floating interest rate. The set of fixed cash flows is known as the fixed leg, while the set of floating cash flows is known as the floating leg. The cash flows occur at regular intervals during the life of the contract between inception (t=0) and maturity (t=T). An example could be a fixed-for-floating IRS, who pays a rate of 5 percent on the agreed notional N every three months and receives EURIBOR3M on the agreed notional N every three months.
A futures contract on a stock index also involves a single future cash flow (the delivery price) to be paid at the maturity of the contract. However, the payoff in this case is uncertain because how much profit I will get from this operation will depend on the value of the underlying at maturity.
If the price of the underlying is above the delivery price, then the payoff I get (denoted by function H) is positive (indicating a profit) and corresponds to the difference between the value of the underlying at maturity S(T) and the delivery price K. If the price of the underlying is below the delivery price, then the payoff I get is negative (indicating a loss) and corresponds to the difference between the delivery price K and the value of the underlying at maturity S(T). This characteristic can be summarized in the following payoff formula:
Here, H(S(T)) is the payoff at maturity, which is a function of S(T). Financial derivatives are very important to the modern financial markets. According to the Bank of International Settlements (BIS) as of December 2012, the amounts outstanding for OTC derivative contracts worldwide were Foreign exchange derivatives with 67,358 billion USD, Interest Rate Derivatives with 489,703 billion USD, Equity-linked derivatives with 6,251 billion USD, Commodity derivatives with 2,587 billion USD, and Credit default swaps with 25,069 billion USD. For more information, see http://www.bis.org/statistics/dt1920a.pdf.
Discipline 2 – mathematics
We need mathematical models to capture both the future evolution of the underlying and the probabilistic nature of the contingent cash flows we encounter in financial derivatives.
Regarding the contingent cash flows, these can be represented in terms of the payoff function H(S(T)) for the specific derivative we are considering. Because S(T) is a stochastic variable, the value of H(S(T)) ought to be computed as an expectation E[H(S(T))]. And in order to compute this expectation, we need techniques that allow us to predict or simulate the behavior of the underlying S(T) into the future, so as to be able to compute the value of ST and finally be able to compute the mean value of the payoff E[H(S(T))].
Regarding the behavior of the underlying, typically, this is formalized using Stochastic Differential Equations (SDEs), such as Geometric Brownian Motion (GBM), as follows:
The previous equation fundamentally says that the change in a stock price (dS), can be understood as the sum of two effects—a deterministic effect (first term on the right-hand side) and a stochastic term (second term on the right-hand side). The parameter is called the drift, and the parameter is called the volatility. S is the stock price, dt is a small time interval, and dW is an increment in the Wiener process.
This model is the most common model to describe the behavior of stocks, commodities, and foreign exchange. Other models exist, such as jump, local volatility, and stochastic volatility models that enhance the description of the dynamics of the underlying.
Regarding the numerical methods, these correspond to ways in which the formal expression described in the mathematical model (usually in continuous time) is transformed into an approximate representation that can be used for calculation (usually in discrete time). This means that the SDE that describes the evolution of the price of some stock index into the future, such as the FTSE 100, is changed to describe the evolution at discrete intervals. An approximate representation of an SDE can be calculated using the Euler approximation as follows:
The preceding equation needs to be solved in an iterative way for each time interval between now and the maturity of the contract. If these time intervals are days and the contract has a maturity of 30 days from now, then we compute tomorrow’s price in terms of todays. Then we compute the day after tomorrow as a function of tomorrow’s price and so on. In order to price the derivative, we require to compute the expected payoff E[H(ST)] at maturity and then discount it to the present. In this way, we would be able to compute what should be the fair premium associated with a European option contract with the help of the following equation:
Discipline 3 – informatics (C++ programming)
What is the role of C++ in pricing derivatives? Its role is fundamental. It allows us to implement the actual calculations that are required in order to solve the pricing problem. Using the preceding techniques to describe the dynamics of the underlying, we require to simulate many potential future scenarios describing its evolution. Say we ought to price a futures contract on the EUR/USD exchange rate with one year maturity. We have to simulate the future evolution of EUR/USD for each day for the next year (using equation 3). We can then compute the payoff at maturity (using equation 1). However, in order to compute the expected payoff (using equation 4), we need to simulate thousands of such possible evolutions via a technique known as Monte Carlo simulation. The set of steps required to complete this process is known as an algorithm. To price a derivative, we ought to construct such algorithm and then implement it in an advanced programming language such as C++. Of course C++ is not the only possible choice, other languages include Java, VBA, C#, Mathworks Matlab, and Wolfram Mathematica. However, C++ is an industry standard because it’s flexible, fast, and portable. Also, through the years, several numerical libraries have been created to conduct complex numerical calculations in C++. Finally, C++ is a powerful modern object-oriented language.
It is always difficult to strike a balance between clarity and efficiency. We have aimed at making computer programs that are self-contained (not too object oriented) and self-explanatory. More advanced implementations are certainly possible, particularly in the context of larger financial pricing libraries in a corporate context. In this article, all the programs are implemented with the newest standard C++11 using Code::Blocks (http://www.codeblocks.org) and MinGW (http://www.mingw.org).
The Bento Box template
A Bento Box is a single portion take-away meal common in Japanese cuisine. Usually, it has a rectangular form that is internally divided in compartments to accommodate the various types of portions that constitute a meal. In this article, we use the metaphor of the Bento Box to describe a visual template to facilitate, organize, and structure the solution of derivative problems. The Bento Box template is simply a form that we will fill sequentially with the different elements that we require to price derivatives in a logical structured manner. The Bento Box template when used to price a particular derivative is divided into four areas or boxes, each containing information critical for the solution of the problem. The following figure illustrates a generic template applicable to all derivatives:
The Bento Box template – general case
The following figure shows an example of the Bento Box template as applied to a simple European Call option:
The Bento Box template – European Call option
In the preceding figure, we have filled the various compartments, starting in the top-left box and proceeding clockwise. Each compartment contains the details about our specific problem, taking us in sequence from the conceptual (box 1: derivative contract) to the practical (box 4: algorithm), passing through the quantitative aspects required for the solution (box 2: mathematical model and box 3: numerical method).
This article gave an overview of the main elements of Quantitative Finance as applied to pricing financial derivatives. The Bento Box template technique will be used to organize our approach to solve problems in pricing financial derivatives. We will assume that we are in possession with enough information to fill box 1 (derivative contract).
Resources for Article:
- Application Development in Visual C++ – The Tetris Application [article]
- Getting Started with Code::Blocks [article]
- Creating and Utilizing Custom Entities [article]